01
Deterministic rules
Tiers, pro-rata, a collection gate and a cap, applied the same way every month.
Controlled Conversion · Reference demonstration
Incentive workbooks usually calculate. The control problem is harder: tier rules hidden in formulas, adjustments approved outside the file, and no durable way to prove why a payout is what it is.
What this case proves
01
Tiers, pro-rata, a collection gate and a cap, applied the same way every month.
02
What payroll actually paid becomes the acceptance test.
03
Convention, specification gap or legacy error, each resolved or explicitly signed.
04
Maker-checker, approvals, sign-off, period lock and a traceable audit trail.
The workbook today
The problem is not that Excel cannot calculate. It is that important conventions, adjustments and approvals have become difficult to own and evidence.
Rules snapshot
Below 80% pays nothing; 80%, 90%, 100%, 110% and 120% achievement pay 50%, 80%, 100%, 125% and 150% of target incentive.
If overdue receivables above 90 days exceed 10%, payout is multiplied by 75%. Finance owns the ageing input.
Partial months are pro-rated by eligible days. Payout cannot exceed 150% of pro-rated target incentive.
Changes eligible sales and therefore can change the tier. It requires evidence and Head of Sales approval.
Changes payout only. Finance maker-checker applies; the proposer cannot approve their own override.
Achievement is rounded to one decimal point before tier lookup, an undocumented workbook convention surfaced during specification.
The controlled application
Sales-credit adjustments and payout overrides are deliberately separate. Inputs reconcile before calculation, approvals are explicit, and the period locks before payroll receives the file.
Rule version 1.1 · override evidence attached · ready for period sign-off
Reference video
The demonstration follows the legacy workbook, controlled calculation, approved override and the historical replay through final sign-off.
The equivalence evidence
The first replay produced 117 exact matches and three differences. Investigation converted two into explicit owner decisions; the remaining copied-formula error was not reproduced and was signed as an approved legacy difference.
79.96% achievement was rounded to 80.0% in a hidden column. The owner confirmed the convention and it became an explicit rule.
Returns were deducted when processed rather than against the original sale month. The owner chose the workbook treatment and the specification was updated.
One copied formula used another representative's working days. It was not reproduced; the difference was signed as an approved legacy error.
Boundary
If a sales-performance or HR platform already handles the plan adequately, configure it. Controlled Conversion is for bespoke, material calculations whose rules can be specified and whose paid history can be replayed.
In scope: calculation logic, adjustments, approvals, sign-off, evidence and historical replay.
Not in scope: CRM, territory planning, performance coaching or broad sales analytics.
Controlled Conversion
Start with the workbook, the accountable owner and enough historical periods to design the proof.