Evidence is scattered
Support arrives through email, shared drives, spreadsheets, exported ERP reports and manually assembled workpapers.
ASSURE · AuditEvidence
Make the evidence-to-professional-decision chain explicit, current and defensible.
AuditEvidence is a governed evidence-to-professional-decision workbench for internal audit and IFC. It preserves the exact path from procedure and sample through evidence request, evidence assessment, human review, sufficiency, exceptions, conclusion and sign-off.
The problem
The file is not the evidence chain.
Professional assurance depends on preserving the meaning around the evidence — exact version, exact context, currentness, review and authority.
Version and context drift
A file can exist without making clear which exact version was reviewed, for which sample, attribute or test requirement.
Quality and sufficiency blur
A good individual evidence item does not automatically mean the whole test is sufficiently supported.
AI and professional judgement mix
Drafting or model output can become difficult to distinguish from the decision actually made by the professional reviewer.
Operating flow
From evidence request to governed professional sign-off.
- 01
Request
Create bounded evidence requests and requirements for the exact audit context.
- 02
Receive and version
Ingest support while preserving immutable evidence versions and per-item processing outcomes.
- 03
Link exact context
Bind the exact evidence version to the exact test, sample and attribute context in which it is being used.
- 04
Assess evidence quality
Evaluate relevance, reliability and timeliness with deterministic checks and bounded CAI Intelligence assistance.
- 05
Assess test sufficiency
Evaluate whether the current governed body of evidence sufficiently supports the whole test.
- 06
Conclude and sign off
Record human exceptions, conclusion and governed sign-off on the exact current basis.
Professional distinctions
The controls are strongest where ordinary workflows collapse meaning.
AuditEvidence keeps key professional states separate so a later reviewer does not have to infer what happened from filenames or narrative workpapers.
Uploaded is not relied upon
Uploaded ≠ received-for-requirement ≠ accepted ≠ linked ≠ relied ≠ assessed.
Quality is not sufficiency
Evidence-item quality and test-level evidence sufficiency remain separate professional concepts.
AI is not authority
CAI Intelligence may propose, extract, assess and explain. Professional decisions remain human-governed.
Historical is not current
When the governed basis changes materially, a prior decision remains historical but may cease to be current.
What AuditEvidence preserves
A current, inspectable basis for professional judgement.
- 01Governed evidence basis
Exact EvidenceVersion, provenance, support context and reliance remain traceable.
- 02Evidence-quality review
Relevance, reliability and timeliness stay explicit and reviewable.
- 03Test sufficiency
The support matrix and sufficiency decision operate on the current governed body of evidence.
- 04Exceptions
Actual test deviations remain distinct from missing or insufficient evidence.
- 05Conclusion and sign-off
Human-authored conclusion revisions and governed sign-off preserve responsibility and basis.
Product boundary
AuditEvidence is not an autonomous auditor.
It is also not designed to replace the entire GRC, planning or repository stack. The product owns the governed evidence-to-decision workflow while professional authority remains with the auditor and reviewer.
AuditEvidence